I love a good theoretical ethical dilemma. I could solve those all day long. What I don’t like is a real-life ethical dilemma. Those are hard. I REALLY don’t like an ethical dilemma at work. I’ve had to quit jobs in the past because my ethics didn’t jibe with what the company was doing. It stinks to have to look for work because of something like that. But most of us, whether employed in the instructional technology, performance technology, or learning sciences, or even something entirely unrelated, will be faced with these dilemmas throughout our career. My response when I’ve come up against this is that I’m a human first, and a <insert job title here> second. If after careful examination, consideration, and introspection a situation doesn’t jibe with my human-ness, it won’t jibe with my employee-ness. Simplistic? Yes. But so far it’s served me well.
I wanted to know more about potential dilemmas designers might face and found this presentation from 2002. There are some interesting situations to chew on that I hadn’t thought of. Every career has a moral dim
ension, but I feel like those working in education are faced with so many more layers and complexity, especially when it comes to the education of children. One needs to factor in so many things when designing or evaluating instruction or performance–socio economics, cultural and ethnic backgrounds, vast differences in prior knowledge, learning (dis)abilities, etc.
The burden seems very heavy.
And who, ultimately, is the customer? Is it the end-user or the person writing your paycheck?
I’m going to go with the end-user and hope I work for somebody that agrees with me. : ) Because even if instead of designing for those above I’m designing for what’s below, my job ultimately is to care about their experience and potential for learning.


